Creativity in SEO as discussed in the last post, is often the difference between those who do an OK job, and those who can produce seemingly miraculous results, and often, the only real difference between white-hat activities and grey / blackhat is quite simply your intent.
If you arrive at a site and find out there are hundreds of indexed duplicate pages, of course any self respecting SEO would obviously 301 redirect them at the strongest version of the page you have indexed, and reap the (slight) PR and ranking gains from the best page absorbing several more non-ranking versions of itself.
This of course is perfectly normal white hat SEO / webmaster behaviour.
However, if you’re doing exactly the same thing, having purposely allowed Google to index say thousands of your site’s search? pages, and then 301-ing them into the best landing page, that’s black hat, but the only real difference is your intent.
So say that you start work on a site and quickly find that they have several versions of the same site, lets say mainsite.com is the main domain, but as so often they also have 2 other related domains, mainsite-keyword.com (duplicate site A) & keyword-mainsite.com (dup site B) both up and running with identical versions of the site, but usually with no links to those, and no rankings as it’s duplicate content and as such wont usualy show anywhere as the original version with the best link profile will be ranking, the other versions will be filtered anyway..
Do you..
- 301 both A & B straight to mainsite.com and let Google take it’s usual actions over the next month or two..
- 301 A to B and then link at A to speed up the process and inject A with a little bit of extra oomph, then when A has been fully assimilated into B, do the same from B to mainsite.com… ?
what’s the difference?
Option One is absolutely white hat and will give some ranking benefits..
Option Two is much more effective because (a) the 301’s will happen much faster if you link at the page that is now being redirected, and (b) because apart from dramatically speeding up the whole process you’re also injecting lastminute extra link-strength into each donor page, as it sacrifices itself and donates it’s Google-life to the next page down the chain.
So we’re back to that question of intent.
Surely as an SEO our intent is of basically to get mainsite.com ranking as well as it can do..?
Chaining 301s together can occasionally get troublesome after the 3rd hop but always seems to work very well with up to 2 hops..
So if we had 8 versions of the same thing, is it:
- dup sites 1-8 into mainsite.com.. job done.. ?
Or is it..
- 1, 2 & 3 into 4
- 5, 6 & 7 into 8
- 4 & 8 into mainsite.com
if you link at 1, 2 and 3, at the beginning of the process, then once they have disappeared out of the index, and there is only 4 left, then 301 it to mainsite.com and link at it (4) again to speed / strengthen..
This is very effective, but could of course be considered “doing things for search engines” rather than for users, and hence your intent is SERP manipulation..
Decisions decisions..
Lets be honest, SEO is basically about an intent to manipulate SERPs, if you already ranked at the top you probably wouldn’t be engaging in SEO anyway would you?
The real decision of course is the same as always, when you have effective little tricks that straddle the lines between white and less than white hat SEO, do you dare use them?
Not on client sites of course, but if we didnt try these things on our own sites we wouldnt know they work would we?
301’s are a hugely under used technique in general (except in Black hat land where theyve been abusing them for years) and are a valuable legitimate part of an SEO’s arsenal.
Hopefully this has been a little insight into taking some time to think creatively about the situation and strategy may sometimes allow you to accomplish the same thing, only better.
I’ll leave the ethics of what you do on your own sites up to you